<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>All About Nortel - Latest Comments in Irony 101?</title><link>http://allaboutnortel.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://allaboutnortel.disqus.com/irony_101/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:22:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Irony 101?</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/07/08/irony-101/#comment-17107160</link><description>&lt;p&gt;this was a very intriguing issue indeed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">resume template</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:22:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Irony 101?</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/07/08/irony-101/#comment-837406</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not so strange.  The Big 4 have few choices for these types of contracts since they would have a hard time maintaining independence while having such a large relationship if they were still their auditors.  What is strange though is that there is still a derivative suit against Deloitte related to their activities with Nortel.  Pending litigation, where your former client is your adversary, should make a business relationship with your former client, even in "normal course" also an independence issue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/72911/000090956708000214/o38996ae10vk.htm#122" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/72911/000090956708000214/o38996ae10vk.htm#122"&gt;http://www.sec.gov/Archives...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/29596-nortel-deloitte-rang-alarm-bells" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://seekingalpha.com/article/29596-nortel-deloitte-rang-alarm-bells"&gt;http://seekingalpha.com/art...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2002/07/17/nortelsuitd_0207171.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2002/07/17/nortelsuitd_0207171.html"&gt;http://www.cbc.ca/money/sto...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fmckenna</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:00:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Irony 101?</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/07/08/irony-101/#comment-836549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Deloitte also made big-time coin feeding on Nortel's SAP habit. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">G&amp;F</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:23:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>