<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>All About Nortel - Latest Comments in Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://allaboutnortel.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://allaboutnortel.disqus.com/nortel8217s_successful_green_campaign/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:13:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-3089569</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.abiresearch.com/home.jsp" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.abiresearch.com/home.jsp"&gt;http://www.abiresearch.com/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I call conspiracy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hewlett-Packard (HP) has been ranked at the top of the latest Vendor Matrix released by ABI Research.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IBM and Cisco claimed the second and third spots in the company’s new evaluation of data center equipment vendors’ efforts to improve their performance on energy conservation and environmental issues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">less</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:13:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-3089512</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cisco Systems has been ranked at the top of the latest Vendor Matrix released by ABI Research.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nortel Networks and Hewlett-Packard (HP) claimed the second and third spots in the company's new evaluation of network switching vendors' internal green initiatives as well as the greenness of their switches.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Vendor Matrix is an analytical tool developed by ABI Research to provide a clear understanding of vendors' positions in specific markets. Vendors are assessed on the important parameters of "innovation" and "implementation" across several criteria unique to each vendor matrix.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Nortel, which finished first in the Implementation category, builds the 'greenest' switches, which have been optimized for low power consumption," says ABI Research vice president Stan Schatt. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">less</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:10:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2289383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Proto, it appears you stopped drinking around 9:51pm, but didn't sober up enough by midnight to post here coherently without malice.  You should stop and seriously think.  All this inner anger cannot be healthy.  I sincerely hope you would never do any harm beyond the words you type.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Perhaps you need to rethink the path you are walking and make a U-turn to the person you were before it all happened.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">concerned for jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:27:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2288821</link><description>&lt;p&gt;*sighs*&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ad hominem's are a Nortel specialty. Things never change.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ex-nortel^2</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:46:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2288796</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, the real Proto has finally come out of his shell.  The fella is quite vulgar by the looks of it.  I wonder why?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">concerned for jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:44:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2285890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Give someone hurting a few drinks and they will hold back nothing.  Seems Proto didn't need much encouragement last night on the Nortel yahoo message board to express his true feelings towards Nortel shareholders.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Proto has an extreme unhealthy dislike for anyone even remotely positive on Nortel and it shows here, but it went to a much different level on the yahoo message board last night.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If i may, I would like to post a link along with his commentary.  If you are sensitive about a persons vulgar expression under the influence of alcohol, you may want to stop reading right now.  You just can't make these things up.  It's the individual themself stripping and stating their true feelings, like a microphone being accidently left on after the interview ended and some unintended comments become embarassingly part of the record:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_N/threadview?m=te&amp;amp;bn=12906&amp;amp;tid=913644&amp;amp;mid=913644&amp;amp;tof=13&amp;amp;frt=2#913644" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_N/threadview?m=te&amp;amp;bn=12906&amp;amp;tid=913644&amp;amp;mid=913644&amp;amp;tof=13&amp;amp;frt=2#913644"&gt;http://messages.finance.yah...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;10-Sep-08 09:51 pm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;posted by,&lt;br&gt;protospherical1&lt;br&gt;Sentiment : Strong Sell&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Shhhh Message board round campfire chats here... k?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...First throw stupid ugly pumpers into fire for calling us liars, and wanting to buy more... they burn faster than most people, after all they are in their native environment&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;K,,, next... Nortel is slime ball big business theatrics POS... K?, but with moral majority in opposition, politics must play out... k? zero. now shhhhh... for sure zero... shhhhh now&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for pumpers. look at MG and jack K?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;shhhh... wordsofwizdumb you are next and we have people interested in you, very very powerful people... watch and learn genius... heh, poetic justice...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;k ? good guys be happy don't worry, honesty draws no fire&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;bad guys watch and learn, when too late its too late, up to you.. see MG/jack and soon to be W0W if you don't believe me =)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;my goodness I love to drink and post, hahaha pumpers. in your face 50 cents presplit for all the grief over the years hahaha looks so good on you... mydocs and triumph? FUBAR, trust me... LOL big time....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can't say we didn't warn you poor coward POS devils&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I live to kick their ass when I have a few... CHEERS! Have a nice Day! LOL&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nortel? you too... into the cornfield you go... swooosh and kaboom!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;=) =) hahaha... CHEERS! disclosure: 2 beer / 2 rye =) LOL (never could drink)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PS. pumpers pull my finger LOL &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">concerned for jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:01:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2284863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess there are repercussions for posting unfounded rumors after all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">public_info_on_proto</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:48:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2277470</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Never debating facts but personal attacks ...how shameless&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I guess the blogg poll was right, most of you stalking slandering reptiles really are Nortel employees!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am not as polite as ethical Gary Daichendt. I think the stock price looks good on you bullies at 50 cents extreme presplit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Good luck finding a job with Nortel on your resume when this company folds let alone with personalities like yours.  I also dread to see what your personal lives are like from a psychological perspective, just read your posts. Poor devils.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No wonder the company is in trouble with mentality like this, next thing you know these cruel idiots will threaten to grab my face  LOL&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stick to the facts,  honesty draws no fire. Cowards.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The more you fruitcake weenies  pump, the more shameful you appear to a moral majority.&lt;br&gt;Enough to make anyone civil throw up... shame on you, if you had any... what poor excuses for human beings I tell ya... Nortel employees to boot...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cisco Tax BS , WiMax gone like Neptune  LTE is a joke with UMTS sold,  as it makes new lows 3 years later as I am painted a liar? Heh...as I get political flack from fruitcakes... too funny...What do you want from me? Happy talk? Sorry....  I don't lie. $20 was no buy a year ago and I don't contradict my word let alone written agreements on several occasions.  I still believe in morality, and so do most. Look what deviates as an abnormal minority from the moral majority, crooks, and criminals are stoooopid.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can hardly wait until fraud trials hit the news... to tell ya I told ya so yet again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">protospherical1</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:14:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2271107</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tired,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Appreciate your comment and no, you have not missed my intentions. I try to see through the style and look at the substance of the comments, as I would want others to do the same with mine. The goal, as you have previously stated, is not to just agree/disagree but to have substantive discussions and offer some solutions. Nortel’s team would exercise great judgment in taking some of the suggestions presented herein to avoid the future creation of more Protos.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On a personal note, how can you possibly not like comments from such a ‘telecom expert’ :).&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">broadbandbill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:33:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2270293</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I will say that despite what I often find to be incredibly questionable comments by proto, and despite a clear desire on his part to see the company utterly destroyed, I must take into consideration his extreme losses.  I haven't lost nearly as much money and I'm sure have not personally suffered to the degree that many others have.  So although I dislike proto's comments a lot, and sense more malice than true rational thinking in them, I also feel a degree of sympathy and understanding for his rather slanted views.  BB - thank you again for trying to bring some balance into the discussions.  I don't always agree with or like what you say, but I appreciate the (somewhat) Solomon-like arguments you seem to bring to the table when there's clear division in what people feel on this board.  And if I've misread your intentions, well, take the thanks all the same.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tired</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:34:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2270053</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BB,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you really want to know how much money proto lost, start reading on page 84 of this publicly available document:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nortelsecuritieslitigation.com/affdavid_en2.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.nortelsecuritieslitigation.com/affdavid_en2.pdf"&gt;http://www.nortelsecurities...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just don't start calling him at home&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">public_info_on_proto</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:18:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2262411</link><description>&lt;p&gt;TIC,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't do cop-outs. Sadly, we will never know what Proto's responses would have been had Nortel's management team executed on half of what it promised...--bb&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">broadbandbill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:42:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2261409</link><description>&lt;p&gt;BB, Nortel Management does not control Proto's decision to make false and misleading statements about Nortel.  That is his choice, his responsibility and his accountability as an adult.  Blame shifting his junk to Nortel management is a cop-out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree there are problems at Nortel.  They own that just as Proto owns the nonsense he chooses to write.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tongue.In.Cheek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:31:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2261283</link><description>&lt;p&gt;TIC; Others,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Proto’s posts are the symptom and not the disease and they do not prove anything. How can his lonely posts ‘damage Nortel’ when we all know that can only be done by a bunch of mostly incompetent executives that are clueless about the problems they face and even more clueless about the required solutions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In defense of Proto, we don’t know how much money he has lost. His ramblings are only a reflection of what has transpired at Nortel, nothing more. When leadership disappoints it opens itself to the ugly side of disappointment. It is Nortel’s management that controls Proto’s (and others’) responses, not Proto, myself or anyone else for that matter. We all want to be part of a winning strategy and guessed wrong. Blaming Proto deals only with style and not substance, or the lack thereof as is the case with Nortel. Start hammering the real problem…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;bb&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">broadbandbill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:22:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2259910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Profound it comes to light from a Nortel supporter of all people too &lt;a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/datacenter/comments/powe" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.cisco.com/datacenter/comments/powe"&gt;http://blogs.cisco.com/data...&lt;/a&gt;..."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That was your source fella?  A message by someone on another blog?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How pathetic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would say your credibility has taken a serious blow and recovery is remote.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">concerned for jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:43:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2259827</link><description>&lt;p&gt;proto- is clearly a deviant and lives up to this title daily.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not surprisingly he has an identical twin that posts under the name "yes4apple"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Psychiatrist</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:35:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2259553</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Proto proves once again that he will say/do anything for the purpose of damaging Nortel in the marketplace.  For instance, when Mark Evans posts the IBM purchase of Nortel rumor on this blog, Proto instantly attempts to bash the idea, yet when there is a lawsuit reference in a Cisco owned blog, then of course that must be real and must be the truth about Nortel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What we also know is that Nortel used to have a website named something like &lt;a href="http://www.ciscoenergytax.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.ciscoenergytax.com"&gt;www.ciscoenergytax.com&lt;/a&gt; which is no longer available.  The timing of that website is very similar to the date stamp of the blog post that Proto references.  Perhaps Cisco did request a stop order on that website since it used the Cisco name within it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then there is the 3rd party and independent tests and report done by the Tolly Group in which Cisco was invited to participate but Cisco made the choice to not respond to the invitation.  The report can be found at &lt;a href="http://www.tolly.com/ts/2008/Nortel/ERS8600/Tolly208298NortelConvergedNetEnergyCosts.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.tolly.com/ts/2008/Nortel/ERS8600/Tolly208298NortelConvergedNetEnergyCosts.pdf"&gt;http://www.tolly.com/ts/200...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tongue.In.Cheek</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:13:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2254823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I second Nortelhand’s comment; how can you call it a “Successful Campaign” when according to Bo Gowen’s prior comment the campaign is still in its early stages. And since when did McKinsey become the expert on successful marketing campaigns in the networking sector? Shouldn’t this be a results-based conclusion?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;bb&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">broadbandbill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:01:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2253853</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The GREEN campaign is doing wonders to the stock price.  Great stratagy Mike Z.  Much more of this and Nortel will be trading on the pink sheet.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nortelhand</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:19:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2253755</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Profound it comes to light from a Nortel supporter of all people too&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.cisco.com/datacenter/comments/power_pickups_and_polar_bears/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.cisco.com/datacenter/comments/power_pickups_and_polar_bears/"&gt;http://blogs.cisco.com/data...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; "As a side note, I learned today that Cisco has filed a law suit against Nortel based upon their ‘Green Campaign’."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">protosphere</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:09:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2252177</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cisco has a vision that drives a strategic plan that they're executing on.  I've been following it since 1999.  Sure, there have been market, economy, and personality driven course corrections but that's a good thing.  Cisco isn't usually first to market, but steady and undeterred execution is part of what makes Cisco strong and builds confidence within their customer base.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I haven't seen vision at Nortel since the days of John Roth and one thing that Nortel used to excel at - execution - has fallen apart.  With a few exceptions, Nortel's product launch pad has become a graveyard for failed initiatives.  The MZ team didn't create this problem, but I haven't seen any indication that they have what it takes to fix it.  After years on the job, I still don't see a Nortel vision+strategy I can point to, let alone execution.  Hyperconnectivity is a borrowed observation of what's going on in the market.  Without a strong strategic plan and execution strategy to back it up, it's mere hype.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The days when Nortel was a real competitor of Cisco are fading. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Another Nortel Watcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:51:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2251719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Observer – Beg to differ. Not one to defend Cisco but, at the very least, Cisco has shown up to the ‘Web 2.0 party’ while Nortel is still stuck in Web 0.9; just look at Nortel’s web site, boring and so last century.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Marketing has a lot less to do with details (who, what, why) and a lot more with messaging (me, here, now). Failed to see how lower power consumption will get me a faster user experience; again, users don’t need to see the sausage-making process or what’s inside it. Let’s not forget that Web2.0 (and later incarnations) requires an underlying software architecture, which Cisco has. And where’s Nortel’s? Oh yeah, it is in the process of being hyper-connected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The bottom line is this: Nortel has process-based marketing; Cisco has vision-based marketing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You are right about one thing; it is definitely not a fair comparison. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">broadbandbill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:18:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2251255</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Broadbandbill - your comparing apples and oranges. Cisco is late to the web 2.0 party. The real comparison would be something like Project Chainsaw to anything Cisco is doing in the UC space. Cisco is behind in the race for web 3.0. Cisco is a marketing machine that is good at selling the sizzle but in the coming age of frugality, no one will want to pay those prices.  Go look at the background of Meghan Asha (Parikh) &amp;amp; Shane Battier - they certainly aren't like the average person on the street that works for a living.  If this epic collapse of the economy teaches anything, it will teach us frugality. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Observer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:48:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2248349</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To paraphrase an old adage: those that know how to market do, those that don’t try to smear the competition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To truly appreciate the difference between Cisco and Nortel visit Cisco’s brilliant marketing campaign called ‘Digital Cribs’. While Nortel is still stuck ‘inside the box’ (power consumption, bits/per... , all that sooo 90s marketing mindset) Cisco has taken it to a whole new level – lifestyle.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As much as I do not care for Cisco can’t help but admire an effective marketing campaign that doesn’t throw mud at its competitors. Staying above the background radiation, simple and brilliant!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;bb&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">broadbandbill</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:52:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nortel&amp;#8217;s Successful Green Campaign</title><link>http://www.allaboutnortel.com/2008/09/09/nortels-successful-green-campaign/#comment-2248286</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I did some digging around. I couldn't find anything about Cisco suing Nortel. Perhaps Proto can provide some more information.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:47:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>